Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.-
During the submission process, authors must check that their work complies with all of the following points, and works may be returned to authors who do not comply with these rules.
The manuscript has not been previously published and has not been considered by another publisher. - The work file is in Microsoft Word, RTF or OpenDocument format
- The text must be printed with single spacing; TNR, 14 point; underlining is not allowed (except for URLs); all illustrations, figures and tables must be placed in the text after the first reference in the text, and not at the end
- A sample of the materials design is presented at the link: Monograph_Template
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with the Scientific Center of Innovative Research agree to the following:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the Scientific Center of Innovative Research the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. This license allows others to share and distribute the work in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that proper credit is given to the authors and the original publication source.
-
Authors may also enter into separate, non-exclusive agreements for further distribution of the published version (e.g., deposit in an institutional repository or inclusion in a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in the Scientific Center of Innovative Research.
Privacy Statement
Manuscripts should be reviewed with due respect to the confidentiality of the authors. Submitting their manuscripts to review, the authors trust the editors the results of their scientific work and creative efforts, from which their reputation and career may depend on. The rights of authors may be violated in case of disclosure of confidential information during the review of manuscripts. Reviewers also have the right to privacy, which should be maintained by the editor. Confidentiality may be violated if there is dishonesty or fraud, but in other cases, it should be followed.
The editorial staff should not disclose information about the manuscripts (including their receipt, content, status in the process of review, criticism of reviewers or final fate) to anyone except authors and reviewers. This includes requests for the use of materials for legitimate actions.
Reviewers’ comments cannot be published or made public without the permission of the reviewer, author and editor.
Thoughts differ on whether reviewers should remain anonymous. Authors should get acquainted with the Information for journal authors to which they have decided to submit the manuscript to find out whether the reviews are anonymous. If the comments are not signed, the reviewers should not be disclosed to the author or anyone else without the permission of the reviewers.