Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another press for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in the Microsoft Word, RTF, or OpenDocument file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Press.

Author Guidelines

Before submission your book (chapter), please check Review Guidelines, infringement of which will result in immediate rejection of the manuscript and possible sanctions against the author.
Make sure that the manuscript presents an academic value, significance of research, as well as that its originality and practical significance are well described; the manuscript makes a contribution to earlier researches concerning the topic.
The author must take a close look at the manuscript requirements. They are not too rigid, but we recommend to meet them. Therefore, we ask the authors to make every effort to meet the requirements, as it will provide the quality of their materials and will make it easier for the editorial staff to set the manuscript for publication.

The manuscript should be sent to the Press via Submission and must included several parts: Title. Abstract, Key words, Results, References.

Review Guidelines

The review of manuscripts submitted for publication in “Scientific Center of Innovative Researches” OÜ is carried out in order to maintain a high scientific and theoretical level and the allocation of the most relevant and progressive scientific works.

The “Scientific Center of Innovative Research” OÜ uses the method of double blind reviewing:

- the reviewer does not know the personal information about the author / authors;
- the author / authors do not know the personal information about the reviewer.

Scientific manuscripts submitted to the editorial staff undergo the initial control over the completeness and correctness of their registration on the press's website, as well as compliance with the requirements for the design of manuscripts.

The primary expert review of a scientific article is conducted by Editor-In-Chief or Scientific Editor.

The Editor-In-Chief (Scientific Editor) defines the reviewer from the members of the editorial staff who is responsible for the scientific field in which the article is written for manuscript.

In case of absence of a member of the editorial staff, the mentor of the respective field, the Editor-In-Chief (Scientific Editor) defines the external reviewer for the submitted manuscript.

Reviewers (both members of the editorial staff and external reviewers) must be known specialists in the subject of the submitted manuscript and have publications in the field of the research (preferably for the last 5 years) in the journals included in scientometic databases Scopus and Web of Science.

After the reviewing a scientific article, the reviewer can:

- recommend the manuscript for publication;
- recommend the manuscript for the publication after the author’s reviewing, taking into account the comments and wishes expressed;
- not recommend the manuscript for publication.

Cost of publications

The cost of the manuscript as a chapter of monograph is:
- 100 euros (50 euros for a low-income or middle-income country) for hard book + ebook;
- 50 euros (free for a low-income or middle-income country) for e-book.

Price includes the posting an manuscrit at press website, online certificate of publication of the article and its indexing.
Pay per manuscrit shall be made only after review and accepted for publication based on the invoice.

The press does not charge the processing and submission fees.

Privacy Statement

Manuscripts should be reviewed with due respect to the confidentiality of the authors. Submitting their manuscripts to review, the authors trust the editors the results of their scientific work and creative efforts, from which their reputation and career may depend on. The rights of authors may be violated in case of disclosure of confidential information during the review of manuscripts. Reviewers also have the right to privacy, which should be maintained by the editor. Confidentiality may be violated if there is dishonesty or fraud, but in other cases, it should be followed.

The editorial staff should not disclose information about the manuscripts (including their receipt, content, status in the process of review, criticism of reviewers or final fate) to anyone except authors and reviewers. This includes requests for the use of materials for legitimate actions.

Reviewers’ comments cannot be published or made public without the permission of the reviewer, author and editor.

Thoughts differ on whether reviewers should remain anonymous. Authors should get acquainted with the Information for journal authors to which they have decided to submit the manuscript to find out whether the reviews are anonymous. If the comments are not signed, the reviewers should not be disclosed to the author or anyone else without the permission of the reviewers.